MedDeviceGuideMedDeviceGuide
Back

FDA TEMPO Pilot for Digital Health Devices: Enforcement Discretion, CMS ACCESS Model, Real-World Evidence, and the New Regulatory Pathway for Chronic Disease Technology

The FDA launched the Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) pilot on January 2, 2026, a first-of-its-kind program that allows digital health device manufacturers to deploy products under enforcement discretion while collecting real-world performance data in cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal, and behavioral health conditions. Integrated with CMS's Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) model launching July 5, 2026, TEMPO represents a paradigm shift from traditional premarket authorization toward risk-based enforcement with real-world evidence generation. This guide covers TEMPO eligibility, the four clinical focus areas, enforcement discretion scope, CMS outcome-aligned payment, the application process, key dates, and what digital health companies must do to participate.

Ran Chen
Ran Chen
Global MedTech Expert | 10× MedTech Global Access
2026-05-2912 min read

What Is the TEMPO Pilot?

On December 5, 2025, the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) announced the Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) for Digital Health Devices Pilot — a voluntary program that represents a fundamental shift in how the agency approaches digital health device regulation. The formal Federal Register notice was published on December 8, 2025 (90 FR 56768). The FDA began accepting statements of interest on January 2, 2026.

TEMPO is designed to promote access to certain digital health devices while safeguarding patient safety. Under the pilot, manufacturers of eligible digital health devices can request enforcement discretion for certain FDA premarket requirements, including premarket authorization and Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) requirements, while deploying their devices in clinical settings and collecting real-world performance data.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary framed the initiative as part of the agency's evolving approach: "The TEMPO pilot marks a major step in the agency's plan to support technology-enabled care, strengthen chronic disease management, and expand health care access for patients nationwide."

Key Program Parameters

Parameter Detail
Program Type Voluntary pilot
Lead FDA Center CDRH (Center for Devices and Radiological Health)
CMS Partner CMMI (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation)
Launched January 2, 2026 (statements of interest)
Follow-Up Requests Began March 2026
Manufacturers per Area Up to approximately 10 U.S.-based manufacturers per clinical area
Clinical Areas 4 (cardio-kidney-metabolic early, CKM established, musculoskeletal, behavioral health)
Enforcement Discretion Premarket authorization, IDE, 21 CFR Parts 50 and 56
Data Collection Real-world performance monitoring and reporting
Related CMS Program ACCESS Model (launches July 5, 2026)

The Four Clinical Focus Areas

TEMPO targets four high-burden chronic disease categories where digital health devices have the greatest potential to improve patient outcomes. The program expects to select up to approximately ten U.S.-based manufacturers in each area, reflecting a broad spectrum of company sizes and maturities.

1. Early Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Conditions

Focus on early-stage chronic conditions including:

  • Hypertension
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Obesity
  • Prediabetes

Digital health devices in this category might include remote monitoring platforms, AI-driven risk assessment tools, connected blood pressure monitors, and lifestyle management applications that help patients manage early cardiometabolic risk before disease progression.

2. Established Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Conditions

Focus on diagnosed chronic conditions including:

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2)
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Heart failure

Devices might include continuous glucose monitors used in new clinical contexts, remote hemodynamic monitoring systems, medication adherence platforms, and AI-powered clinical decision support for chronic disease management.

3. Musculoskeletal Conditions

Focus on chronic musculoskeletal conditions including:

  • Chronic back pain
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Chronic joint pain

Devices in this category could include digital therapeutics for pain management, sensor-based movement analysis platforms, remote physical therapy guidance systems, and activity monitoring devices designed to support musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

4. Behavioral Health Conditions

Focus on behavioral and mental health conditions including:

  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Substance use disorders

Eligible devices might include digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) platforms, AI-driven mental health screening tools, remote patient monitoring for behavioral health indicators, and prescription digital therapeutics for substance use disorders.


How TEMPO Works: Enforcement Discretion Framework

The TEMPO pilot introduces a risk-based enforcement approach that is fundamentally different from traditional FDA premarket review. Here is how it works:

Traditional Pathway vs. TEMPO Pathway

Aspect Traditional FDA Pathway TEMPO Pilot Pathway
Premarket Review 510(k), De Novo, or PMA required Enforcement discretion for premarket authorization
Clinical Trials IDE required for significant risk devices Enforcement discretion for IDE requirements
Informed Consent 21 CFR Part 50 (informed consent) Enforcement discretion for Parts 50 and 56
Data Collection Pre-specified clinical trial endpoints Real-world performance data collection
Timeline to Market Months to years (depending on pathway) Potentially immediate under enforcement discretion
FDA Oversight Premarket review + post-market surveillance Performance monitoring + reporting requirements

What Enforcement Discretion Means

Under TEMPO, FDA exercises enforcement discretion over specific regulatory requirements. This means the agency does not intend to take enforcement action against manufacturers for distributing a device without premarket authorization, provided the manufacturer:

  1. Is participating in the TEMPO pilot in good faith
  2. Is using the device for an intended use covered by the pilot
  3. Is actively collecting, monitoring, and reporting real-world performance data
  4. Continues to meet device safety and quality requirements

Importantly, enforcement discretion is not the same as clearance or approval. Devices deployed under TEMPO are not FDA-cleared or FDA-approved. The manufacturer must ultimately pursue traditional marketing authorization based on the real-world evidence generated during the pilot.

What Is NOT Covered

TEMPO enforcement discretion does NOT extend to:

  • Quality System Regulation (QSR) / Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) requirements — manufacturers must still comply with 21 CFR Part 820
  • Medical device reporting (MDR) obligations under 21 CFR Part 803
  • Registration and listing requirements
  • Labeling requirements beyond enforcement discretion scope
  • Any device with existing FDA authorization for the proposed intended use (already on the market)

Recommended Reading
Medical Device Regulatory Sandboxes: MHRA AI Airlock, FDA TEMPO, and How Innovation Programs Are Reshaping Device Approvals in 2026
Digital Health & AI Regulatory2026-05-02 · 13 min read

The CMS ACCESS Model Connection

TEMPO is explicitly linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center's Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) model. Understanding this connection is critical because it creates the commercial and payment infrastructure that makes TEMPO participation viable.

What Is the ACCESS Model?

The ACCESS model is a CMS Innovation Center initiative launching July 5, 2026, designed to expand technology-enabled integrated care for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions. Key features include:

  • Outcome-aligned payments: Recurring payments tied to measurable health outcomes rather than service volume
  • Technology-supported care: Clinicians can integrate technology-supported care for chronic disease management
  • Performance monitoring: CMS monitors clinician performance and publishes risk-adjusted outcomes
  • Four clinical tracks: Aligned with the same four clinical areas as TEMPO

How TEMPO and ACCESS Work Together

Feature TEMPO (FDA) ACCESS (CMS)
Agency FDA (CDRH) CMS (CMMI)
Role Regulatory pathway Payment and care delivery model
What It Enables Device deployment under enforcement discretion Reimbursement for technology-enabled care
Timeline Statements of interest from Jan 2, 2026 Applications opened Jan 12, 2026; launches July 5, 2026
Data Collection Real-world device performance data Patient outcome data
Relationship TEMPO enables device access ACCESS creates the clinical and payment context

The integration means that TEMPO participants can deploy their digital health devices in a clinical context where CMS is actively reimbursing technology-enabled care, solving the classic "chicken-and-egg" problem of digital health commercialization: getting both regulatory permission and reimbursement simultaneously.

ACCESS Application Timeline

  • January 12, 2026: ACCESS model applications opened
  • April 1, 2026: ACCESS application deadline for first performance period
  • July 5, 2026: ACCESS model launches (first performance period begins)

How to Apply for TEMPO

Step 1: Submit a Statement of Interest

The FDA is accepting statements of interest by email at FDA-TEMPOPilot@fda.hhs.gov from manufacturers interested in participating. The statement should be titled "Statement of Interest for Participation in the TEMPO Pilot" and include:

  1. Proposed indications for use: Identifying the intended use to improve patient outcomes in one of the four ACCESS clinical use areas
  2. Manufacturer name and device description: Basic company information and a description of the digital health device
  3. Current FDA authorization status: Any current authorizations or prior FDA interactions related to the device
  4. Enforcement discretion request: If applicable, a specific request for enforcement discretion, explaining why the device is not currently authorized for the proposed intended use

Step 2: FDA Follow-Up

Upon receipt of the statement of interest, the FDA reviews submissions and follows up with certain potential pilot participants to request additional information. As of May 2026, the FDA:

  • Began sending follow-up requests in March 2026
  • Continues to consider new statements of interest
  • Intends to continue sending follow-up requests to selected applicants

Step 3: Additional Information Submission

If the FDA sends a follow-up request, the types of information that may be requested include:

  • Detailed device technical description and software architecture
  • Risk analysis and mitigation strategies
  • Proposed real-world data collection plan
  • Cybersecurity documentation
  • Patient safety monitoring plan
  • Prior clinical data or evidence supporting the device
  • Manufacturing and quality system information

Step 4: Selection and Participation

The FDA plans to select up to approximately 10 manufacturers per clinical area, choosing participants who "reflect a broad spectrum of manufacturers" — meaning companies of various sizes, types, and maturities. Selected manufacturers enter the pilot and begin deploying their devices under enforcement discretion while collecting real-world performance data.


Key Dates and Timeline

Date Milestone
December 5, 2025 TEMPO pilot announced via FDA press release
December 8, 2025 Federal Register notice published (90 FR 56768)
January 2, 2026 FDA begins accepting statements of interest
January 12, 2026 CMS ACCESS model applications open
March 2026 FDA begins sending follow-up requests to selected applicants
April 1, 2026 ACCESS application deadline (first performance period)
July 5, 2026 ACCESS model launches
Ongoing FDA continues reviewing statements of interest and sending follow-ups

Recommended Reading
J&J Prepares $20B+ DePuy Synthes Sale: Orthopedics Divestiture, the 2012 Synthes Acquisition at $21.3B, and the MedTech Spinoff Wave
M&A & Funding Industry News2026-05-28 · 12 min read

Regulatory Strategy Considerations for Digital Health Companies

Who Should Consider TEMPO

TEMPO is most relevant for digital health companies that:

  • Have a device targeting one of the four chronic condition areas
  • Do not yet have FDA clearance or approval for the proposed intended use
  • Can demonstrate a reasonable safety profile based on existing data
  • Have the infrastructure to collect, monitor, and report real-world performance data
  • Want to generate real-world evidence to support a future marketing submission
  • Are targeting the Medicare population (via the ACCESS model alignment)

Who Should NOT Use TEMPO

TEMPO may not be appropriate for companies that:

  • Already have FDA authorization for the intended use (not needed)
  • Have devices classified as Class III or high-risk (enforcement discretion is for appropriate risk levels)
  • Cannot commit to robust real-world data collection and reporting
  • Are not ready for commercial deployment (the program assumes actual patient use)
  • Target conditions outside the four clinical areas

TEMPO vs. Other FDA Digital Health Programs

Program Purpose Status
TEMPO Enforcement discretion for digital health devices in chronic conditions + real-world evidence Active (Jan 2026)
Pre-Cert Software precertification for SaMD Discontinued
Breakthrough Device Expedited review for innovative devices Active (separate program)
General Wellness Guidance Clarifies when wellness products are not devices Updated January 2026
CDS Guidance Clarifies when clinical decision support is not a device Updated January 2026

TEMPO is distinct from these other programs because it combines regulatory flexibility with a payment model (ACCESS) and requires active real-world evidence generation.


The Bigger Picture: FDA's Evolving Digital Health Strategy

The TEMPO pilot is part of a broader shift in FDA's approach to digital health regulation that accelerated in early 2026:

  1. January 6, 2026: FDA updated its General Wellness guidance, expanding the scope of products that qualify as non-devices, particularly for wearables measuring physiologic parameters
  2. January 6, 2026: FDA updated its Clinical Decision Support (CDS) guidance, clarifying enforcement discretion for certain CDS functions
  3. January 2, 2026: TEMPO pilot launched, creating a new pathway for digital health devices targeting chronic conditions
  4. February 2026: QMSR enforcement began, bringing ISO 13485-aligned quality requirements for device manufacturers

Together, these changes signal the FDA's intent to take a more flexible, risk-based approach to digital health regulation — while maintaining robust safety oversight through real-world monitoring and reporting requirements.


Practical Checklist for TEMPO Participation

If your company is considering the TEMPO pilot, here is a practical checklist:

  • Identify which of the four clinical areas your device targets
  • Determine whether your device currently has FDA authorization for the proposed intended use
  • Draft a statement of interest with proposed indications, device description, and authorization status
  • Prepare supporting documentation (risk analysis, safety data, data collection plan)
  • Submit the statement of interest via email to the FDA contact listed in the Federal Register notice
  • Monitor for FDA follow-up requests (the FDA is sending these on a rolling basis)
  • If selected, develop a comprehensive real-world data collection and reporting plan
  • Ensure QMSR compliance (21 CFR Part 820) — this is NOT covered by enforcement discretion
  • Coordinate with CMS ACCESS model application if targeting Medicare population
  • Plan for future marketing submission based on real-world evidence generated during the pilot

Recommended Reading
Stryker Acquires Inari Medical for $4.9B: Mechanical Thrombectomy, Venous Thromboembolism Device Market, and the $10B Endovascular Opportunity
M&A & Funding Regulatory2026-05-28 · 11 min read

Key Takeaways

  1. First-of-its-kind program: TEMPO is the FDA's first pilot to combine enforcement discretion for digital health devices with a CMS payment model, creating a parallel pathway to market that does not require traditional premarket authorization.

  2. Four clinical areas: The program covers early and established cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal, and behavioral health conditions — some of the highest-burden chronic disease categories in the U.S.

  3. Real-world evidence focus: TEMPO prioritizes real-world data collection over preclinical and clinical trial data, representing a shift toward evidence-based enforcement discretion.

  4. CMS integration: The ACCESS model provides the reimbursement infrastructure that makes TEMPO commercially viable for Medicare-focused digital health companies.

  5. Not a substitute for clearance: TEMPO is a stepping stone, not a replacement for marketing authorization. Manufacturers must ultimately pursue traditional FDA pathways based on the real-world evidence generated during the pilot.

  6. Limited participation: With approximately 10 manufacturers per clinical area, TEMPO is selective. Early application is advantageous.


Last updated: May 29, 2026

Related Articles

M&A & FundingRegulatory

FTC Blocks Edwards Lifesciences' $945M JenaValve Acquisition: Pre-Commercial Antitrust, TAVR-Aortic Regurgitation Innovation Markets, and the First Court Ruling on R&D-Stage Competition in Medical Devices

On January 9, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the FTC's request for a preliminary injunction blocking Edwards Lifesciences' proposed $945 million acquisition of JenaValve Technology, the only competitor to Edwards' JC Medical subsidiary in developing transcatheter aortic valve replacement devices for aortic regurgitation (TAVR-AR). Edwards abandoned the deal the same day. This landmark ruling is the first time a U.S. court recognized a market defined by R&D and commercialization competition among pre-commercial medical devices. This analysis covers Edwards' dual acquisition strategy (JC Medical for $115M + JenaValve for $945M), the FTC's innovation market theory, Judge Contreras' ruling, JenaValve's subsequent FDA PMA approval in March 2026 and U.S. commercial launch in April 2026, the TAVR-AR competitive landscape, implications for structural heart device M&A, and what the decision means for antitrust enforcement in medical device development pipeline deals.

2026-05-29·15 min read
M&A & FundingIndustry News

Waters Corporation Merges with BD Biosciences & Diagnostic Solutions in $18.8B Reverse Morris Trust: Liquid Chromatography, Flow Cytometry, Mass Spectrometry, and the $40B Life Science Tools Market

Waters Corporation completed its combination with BD's Biosciences & Diagnostic Solutions business on February 9, 2026, in a Reverse Morris Trust transaction valued at $18.8 billion at closing. The deal creates a global life sciences and diagnostics leader combining best-in-class liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, flow cytometry, and diagnostic solutions, doubling Waters' total addressable market to $40 billion. This analysis covers the deal structure, BD's strategic rationale for the spin-off, the combined company's technology portfolio and recurring revenue model, synergy projections of $345 million in annualized EBITDA by 2030, implications for regulated medical device and IVD manufacturers who rely on these analytical platforms, and what the deal means for the broader life science tools and diagnostics competitive landscape.

2026-05-29·12 min read
M&A & FundingRegulatory

Boston Scientific Acquires Bolt Medical for Up to $900M: Intravascular Lithotripsy, IVL Competitive Dynamics with J&J Shockwave, and the $3.8B Calcified Artery Device Market

Boston Scientific completed its acquisition of Bolt Medical for up to $900 million ($600 million upfront plus up to $300 million in milestones on a 100% basis) in 2025, adding a laser-based intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) platform to challenge Johnson & Johnson's Shockwave Medical dominance in the treatment of calcified coronary and peripheral artery disease. This analysis covers the deal structure, Bolt Medical's novel laser-optic IVL technology, FDA 510(k) clearance pathway, RESTORE and FRACTURE clinical trial programs, the $1.1 billion global IVL market projected to reach $3.8 billion by 2032, the competitive landscape including Abbott and Stryker, and what the IVL platform wars mean for interventional cardiology device commercialization.

2026-05-28·14 min read